HOMEhome.htmlshapeimage_1_link_0
NEWSnews.htmlshapeimage_2_link_0
MUSICMUSIC.htmlshapeimage_3_link_0
CONTACTcontact.htmlshapeimage_4_link_0
VIDEOvideo.htmlshapeimage_5_link_0
BLOGBLOG.htmlshapeimage_6_link_0
PASTcheerful.htmlshapeimage_7_link_0
LINKSLINKS.htmlshapeimage_8_link_0
 


The Meaning of Life


A jazz group which is improvising obviously differs from a symphony orchestra, since to a large extent each member is free to express herself as she likes. But she does so with a receptive sensitivity to the self-expressive performances of the other musicians. The complex harmony they fashion comes not from playing from a collective score, but from the free musical expression of each member acting as the basis for the free expression of the others. As each player grows more musically eloquent, the others draw inspiration from this and are spurred to greater heights. There is no conflict here between freedom and the ‘good of the whole’, yet the image is the reverse of totalitarian. Though each performer contributes to ‘the greater good of the whole’, she does so not by some grim-lipped self-sacrifice but simply by expressing herself.


There is self-realization, but only through a loss of self in the music as a whole. There is achievement, but it is not a question of self-aggrandizing success. Instead, the achievement – the music itself – acts as a medium of relationship among the performers. There is pleasure to be reaped from this artistry, and – since there is a free fulfilment or realization of powers – there is also happiness in the sense of flourishing. Because this flourishing is reciprocal, we can even speak, remotely and analogically, of a kind of love. One could do worse, surely, than propose such a situation as the meaning of life – both in the sense that it is what makes life meaningful, and – more controversially – in the sense that when we act in this way, we realize our natures at their finest.


by Terry Eagleton